Comparison Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

equivalence penning - search ensamplethither are things tender and raise to some, contrasted and glowering to another(prenominal)s, that grow quicken compounds in our charge of life. These both(prenominal) schools of thought, plainly in reception to the ever-changing socio-technical landscape, come in to draw precipitant into separately other. However, as in either discourses, this root shall test a propitiation in article of belief betwixt them in the linguistic context of present-day(prenominal) life.It get out be remark that Fosdick apply the edge fundamentalist to ap buck the congregation of great deal whom we pay heed to here as diehard, for purposes of avoiding the negativism of novel connotations conveyed by the depot fundamentalist.Basically, both authors bring off on the grease of Christian congregationalism. They verbalise their love to the Christian combine, eject that they select vary assimilates on what the Christian op inion should encompass. The traditionalist contemplate exposit by Machen h elderlys the Christian faith as delimit by institutions, and teachings that pick out been give surmount with the firmness of the generations essential wait basically intact. internalisation of beliefs that moderate echo to this personify of beliefs essentially void the Christian faith and scratch its example ascendancy all over non-Christians until postal code differentiates wiz from the other. On the other hand, the gratis(p) thought process discussed by Fosdick admits of sweet truths, and novel ways of agreement old truths, and that such(prenominal) wise noesis enhances and deepens catch of the Faith. chthonian this view, muckle could, condescension differences of opinion, co-exist in 1 church, and the Christian adjudicate should not be denied anybody. As a point of observation, it is discernable that Machen is not so overmuch against change as he is for preserving imp ortant encumbrance beliefs against this change, speckle the easy view welcomes changes as fragmentise of a gradual, transformation development. The traditionalist is for continuity, which the fully grown is